Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Salvation?

My invite to this blog as a writer mentioned copy-pasting as acceptable (why wouldn't it be in the first place??? But anyway...) so here comes my first copy-paste...hope you enjoy the read.

What exactly are Christians being saved from?

Question: If Christians are saved from hell, who is banishing sinners to hell? Isn't it God the one who promises eternal fire and brimstone for the unrepentant? Aren't people being saved from God himself by God himself?

  • Christians are indeed being saved from God (according to Christianity) since first and foremost, God is the originator of sin (for he created everything) and in himself not being able to forgive Lucifer for fulfilling his purpose; what God created him for, is itself a testament to the Christian's God's cruelty. Another thing, this issue of hell....why would God want to punish a sinner's soul for all eternity? Isn't that cruelty to the extreme? If he wanted to punish wouldn't it have been easier to simply destroy that soul completely?


  • Secondly, Christianity also does give us this hope that hell doesn't exist. This hope however resides mostly in theologians otherwise most Christians would have given up Christianity for the bottle long ago. Most theologians indeed believe that there is no hell for God cannot create us to burn in hell. He is, after all, merciful isn't he? Indeed, a handful of priests have already been excommunicated from the Christianity due to their perpetuating of this rather radical teaching to their flock.

  • Most of all, Christians are not really saved from hell but rather from sin. Yes, ultimately the wages of sin IS death but think of it this way, taking sin as a virus and God as white blood cells, the white blood cells cannot co-exist with the virus and must obliterate it whether or not the outcome of said obliteration is the human being getting better. I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere.


Just a lost mind, doing what it does best...

So....yah! No am not an atheist but that doesn't really matter, what matters is being able to question every belief one takes for granted as truth set in stone and being able to reason for oneself instead of using that age old excuse: we cannot understand God.

SOMALI -A Lawless Land and Ocean

Somalia has the longest coastline in Africa at c. 3,300 km and a productive upwelling region off the Horn providing significant potential for offshore tuna fisheries development. The abundant and diverse marine resources, including seabirds, whales, whale sharks, and several dolphin and turtle species offer promise for ecotourism. This promise, however, stands in stark contrast to current political realities which have developed since the fall of President Siad Barre's regime in 1991 leaving the country without a central government and its waters unrepresented by a recognizable state in the community of nations. Since there is no one particular political entity that controls Somali waters, each coastal region has self-promoted militia, led by a faction leader, which controls its own area, with some entering into controversial fishing vessel licensing arrangements with foreign countries. Somalia's coastal and offshore waters are now dangerous for the innocent passage of yachts and commercial vessel traffic, and foreign fishing vessels operating in Somali waters are at risk of being boarded by militia and having their crews taken hostage. Somali militia, operating from speedboats and posing as coastguard, have worked out the profitability of "coastal patrolling" which includes kidnappings, vessel seizures and ransom demands, all enforced by frequent use of mortars, grenades and small arms.

With the breakdown of civil society, Somalia has degenerated into a no-man's land subject to clan or Islamic Shari'ah law. Owing to continuing unrest in the south, a central government is unlikely to evolve soon. In its place, a decentralized federation of regional political entities has emerged, including the self-proclaimed but unrecognized Republic of Somaliland in the northwest, the self-proclaimed Puntland State in the northeast, Jubaland in the south near Kismayo, and a future Banadir regional administration around Mogadishu when warlords Hussein Aideed (son of late General Farah Aideed) and Ali Mahdi settle their differences. Years of internal conflict have damaged infrastructure in the fishery sector and rendered ineffective any previous oil spill response capability, aids to navigation, and search and rescue capacity in a region of high tanker/cargo traffic to and from the Suez Canal through the Gulf of Aden and calling at Mombasa, the East African shipping hub.


Piracy Experiences

The international community encourages local Somali administrative entities to take responsibility for governance of the region, but when authority is exerted over coastal waters the individuals are labelled pirates. Several incidents involving foreign fishing vessels and cargo vessels arrested by pirates in Somali waters have been reported recently.

September 30, 2008: The seizure by Somali pirates of a Belize-registered vessel which was carrying military arsenal to Kenya is a wake-up call to the international community.

The pirates are not only a threat to international commerce as we know it, but also show how the war in Somalia has spilled beyond its international borders.
While the free movement of cargo has always been the heart of international commerce, freight movement off the Somali waters is going to become complex, risky and expensive.
Merchant ships had previously been attacked, paid ransom and released.
This not only set a bad precedent but also sent a signal to the pirates that it was a way of life. We watched as they snowballed from rag-tag bandits to sea-pirates.
The world also watched as the pirates upped the game, and now they have acquired deadly arsenals and are ready to launch multi-million dollar demands.
The hijacking of the ship with military hardware destined for Kenya is thus not an isolated incident but part of what today drives the thuggish economy of the war-torn Somalia.

As has been pointed out, the small arms in the ship —if they are whisked away— could tilt the balance of power in the war -torn country. Kenya has put it strongly that it cannot, and will not negotiate with terrorists. And that is the way forward. Crime should not pay and should never pay in our international waters.
The world cannot sit back and allow extortionist gangs to freely roam international waters leading to and from the Horn of Africa.

Recently, a Germany ship owner Niels Stolberg made the mistake of paying $1.1 million to recover his $23 million freighter.
It is such payments that have made the pirates increase their attacks hoping to get more maritime prizes.

September 22, 2008: Armed pirates have attacked and hijacked another Greek-owned cargo ship in the eastern coast of Somalia, taking all 19 crew members as hostage, an anti-piracy watchdog said today.

The attack comes just five days after pirates hijacked another Greek bulk carrier within the same area. Four pirates in three speedboats launched an attack on the boat, which was flying a Bahamas flag, before boarding and hijacking the carrier.


The attacks in the eastern cost are more dangerous, because it's open seas. To patrol this open area is not as easy. This needs concerted effort by the United Nations.
Three days later, another Greek-owned bulk carrier cargo ship carrying 25crew was attacked by pirates off the eastern coast of Somalia.

Pirates have captured dozens of ships around the Horn of Africa this year, making the waters off Somalia the most dangerous in the world. "The pirates are continuing because there are no major deterents," said Choong. Sunday's hijacking pushes the number of attacks this year in Somali waters to 56. Some 20,000 ships pass annually through the Gulf of Aden, which connects the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Olympics are welcome for various reasons

A number of sportsmen and women were this week banned for having taken illegal drugs to enable them score victories unsportingly. They remind those acquainted with Olympic history that Socrates categorised into three those who attended the Games in classical antiquity.

The first came only to sell goods, the second to compete and the last merely to watch.

The Athenian philosopher had the kindest words for the mere spectators, saying they were the only selfless and noble-minded participants. Socrates had disparaging words for those who went only to sell goods.

They were the equivalents of today’s corporate “sponsors” of and advertisers on sporting occasions. Their interest is not in sport but only to get rich. Between these antitheses were the competitors themselves.

While they were to be commended for their skills, even they were interested only in the glory of publicity.

As the Beijing event shows, these respective motivations remain with us today. Since the advent of the modern mass media, the Western corporations have invaded every sporting arena to make super-profits by exploiting the natural abilities of the world’s young people.

Thus whenever their publicists declaim about “the Olympic spirit”, they are merely licking their lips for the cash that will flow profusely into their accounts. For, from their mouths, it is clear that the “Olympic spirit” is not the same thing as sporting and international justice.

Take China. Ever since it won the privilege of hosting the 2008 games, peer states have relentlessly accused it of committing crimes against the “Olympic spirit”. Of course, China has recently committed horrendous human rights abuse internally, especially in Tibet.

And, on our continent it continues to finance many tyrannies, especially the Sudanese government’s hecatomb in Darfur. Thus China’s guilt drips like blood from all the interstices of its political skin. As usual, then, my interest is only to put such crimes in world perspective.

During the many four-year inter-Olympic periods after the Second World War, China’s main accusers today -- Britain and the United States -- have committed human rights abuses that boggle the mind in many more countries than China and, as studies now show, even at home.

The Western hostility to China has two related sources. The first is purely propagandistic. It is that China is a “communist” state. This is complete nonsense. For official China interred communism with Mao Zedong’s bones.

The second is more tangible. It is that China presents a serious threat to the North Atlantic’s traditional econo-strategic world hegemony and this threat is being posed on principles that are purely Western. China is capitalistic and militaristic through and through.

All out propaganda war

Thus, even as the 2008 games come to the end, the West continues to wage an all-out propaganda war on China. Originally, the aim was to vitiate its ability to host the Olympics and thus prevent it from making any capital from it, including through arena advertising.

China played into its adversaries’ hands by riding roughshod over Tibet only months before Beijing. The blunder is inexplicable.

But it is not lost on keen observers that the Los Angeles and Atlanta Olympics occurred in the same years that the US was committing serious acts of aggression in Latin America and Balkan Europe.

It is well known, too, that the corporations are the main spur and the primary beneficiaries of all such terroristic acts abroad. The corporations include the industries that manufacture the illicit drugs -- namely, the very people who make filthy money by selling to sportsmen and women all the energy-enhancing chemicals.

An international sporting meet should be the occasion for cultivating the spirit of comradeship and atonement. Thus the organisers should ban the Western habit of making accusations against others about crimes.

Today’s call for an Olympic spirit seems to issue from a profoundly guilty conscience by the Western corporate family, a class which — in business, politics and even sports — has shown itself utterly incapable of any form of justice.

Their “Olympic spirit” is what Wilhelm Liebknecht (referring to Bismarck’s parliament) dismissed as “the fig-leaf of absolutism” (Feigenblatt des Absolutismus), the sporting equivalent of the word “democracy” from a liberal’s mouth, the sop of economic plunder of the lower classes and weaker nations.

By Philip Ochieng, Sunday Nation,August 24th 2008